js-rigor: security affordances — gated provenance, audit hook, DoS hardening, explicit semantics

Per the trust-boundary direction (the caller owns evidence validation):

- Explicit possibilistic semantics module (src/core/possibility.js): the
  single authoritative home for what each operator means (max = disjunctive
  already-valid; min = unvalidified conjunctive ranking with the K-
  validification and surfaced conflict mass; product = Thm-4 heuristic;
  interior OWA = non-maxitive heuristic; reliability = adaptation, never
  conflated with plausibility).
- Provenance is opt-in (re-entrant tracing practice): default check
  results carry only {label, operator, regime}; conflictMass,
  validifiedPossibility, sources, and nonMaxitive appear only under
  includeMeta and on the explain surface. The direct-check cache now
  caches only the meta-less form — includeMeta callers always get a fresh
  full evaluation (previously a cached minimal result was served for
  includeMeta requests, silently stripping detail).
- Audit affordance: new Arbiter({ audit }) emits one record per check
  (decision, possibility, binary, partialGraphUsed, validityLabel,
  sources). The engine stores nothing — the caller owns persistence;
  zero cost when the hook is absent (and the full validity is forced only
  on audit-enabled deployments).
- DoS hardening: partial-graph size limits are enforced BEFORE the
  context allocation (the caller-supplied overlay is the per-check
  allocation point); the CondensedGraphBinary reader gained full bounds
  guards so malformed snapshot buffers fail with clean errors instead of
  RangeError crashes or oversized allocations.
- New security-affordance pins: gating, audit records, and pre-allocation
  limits.

src/authorization/AuthorizationChecker.js

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-import { buildValidity, normalizeValidity, mergeValidity, DEFAULT_VALIDITY } from '../core/validity.js';
+import { buildValidity, normalizeValidity, mergeValidity, minimalValidity, DEFAULT_VALIDITY } from '../core/validity.js';
 import { Arbiter } from '../core/Arbiter.js';
 import { RuleEvaluator } from './RuleEvaluator.js';
 import { RuleCollector } from './RuleCollector.js';
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ export class AuthorizationChecker {
       // Check cache first using composite key (if caching is enabled)
       let cachedResult = null;
       let cacheHint = null;
-      if (!hasPartialGraph && this.decisionCache.directEnabled) {
+      if (!hasPartialGraph && this.decisionCache.directEnabled && !includeMeta) {
         const cacheKey = this._getDirectCheckCacheKey(userKey, relation, objectKey);
         const [hitResult, status] = this.decisionCache.peekDirect(cacheKey);
         cachedResult = status === 'hit' || status === 'expired' ? { result: hitResult, timestamp: 0 } : null;
@@ -111,8 +111,9 @@ export class AuthorizationChecker {
           reason: 'missing_node'
         };
         
-        // Cache the result (only when no partial graph — same guard as success path)
+        // Cache the result (only when no partial graph and the default
-        if (!explain && !hasPartialGraph) {
+        // meta-less form — includeMeta callers get a fresh full evaluation)
+        if (!explain && !hasPartialGraph && !includeMeta) {
           this._cacheDirectCheckResult(userKey, relation, objectKey, result);
         }
         return result;
@@ -163,9 +164,11 @@ export class AuthorizationChecker {
         } else {
            result = {
              possibility: directRel.possibility,
-             validity: directRel.validity !== undefined
+             validity: includeMeta
-               ? buildValidity('identity', [effectiveRelation], [normalizeValidity(directRel.validity)], 1, directRel.possibility)
+               ? buildValidity('identity', [effectiveRelation], [directRel.validity !== undefined ? normalizeValidity(directRel.validity) : 'heuristic'], 1, directRel.possibility)
-               : DEFAULT_VALIDITY,
+               : minimalValidity(directRel.validity !== undefined
+                   ? buildValidity('identity', [effectiveRelation], [normalizeValidity(directRel.validity)], 1, directRel.possibility)
+                   : DEFAULT_VALIDITY),
              // A denied decision (possibility 0) must not leak the
              // relation's reliability — the rule-collection path zeroes it.
              reliability: directRel.possibility > 0
@@ -223,8 +226,8 @@ export class AuthorizationChecker {
         result.meta.cache = cacheHint;
       }
       
-      // Cache the result using composite key
+      // Cache the result using composite key (meta-less form only)
-      if (!explain && !hasPartialGraph) {
+      if (!explain && !hasPartialGraph && !includeMeta) {
         this._cacheDirectCheckResult(userKey, relation, objectKey, result);
       }
       return result;
@@ -348,7 +351,7 @@ export class AuthorizationChecker {
        const finalResult = {
          possibility: resPossibility || 0,
          reliability: res.reliability !== undefined ? res.reliability : 1.0,
-         validity: res.validity || DEFAULT_VALIDITY,
+         validity: includeMeta ? (res.validity || DEFAULT_VALIDITY) : minimalValidity(res.validity || DEFAULT_VALIDITY),
          ...(collectValues && res.collectedValues && Array.isArray(res.collectedValues) && { collectedValues: res.collectedValues }),
          ...(includeMeta && {
            meta: { 
@@ -566,7 +569,7 @@ export class AuthorizationChecker {
     const result = {
        possibility: maxAllow,
        reliability: maxAllow > 0 ? bestAllowReliability : maxDeny > 0 ? bestDenyReliability : 0,
-       validity: finalValidity,
+       validity: includeMeta ? finalValidity : minimalValidity(finalValidity),
        ...(includeMeta && {
          meta: { 
           allow: bestAllow, 

src/authorization/CompiledEvaluator.js

@@ -144,9 +144,7 @@ export class CompiledEvaluator {
     const result = {
       possibility: relationStrength,
       reliability: directRel.reliability !== undefined ? directRel.reliability : 1.0,
-      validity: directRel.validity !== undefined
+      validity: buildValidity('identity', [relName], [directRel.validity !== undefined ? normalizeValidity(directRel.validity) : 'heuristic'], 1, relationStrength),
-        ? buildValidity('identity', [relName], [normalizeValidity(directRel.validity)], 1, relationStrength)
-        : DEFAULT_VALIDITY,
       possibility_allow: relationStrength,
       possibility_deny: 0,
       ...(includeMeta && {

src/authorization/rules/DirectRule.js

@@ -71,9 +71,7 @@ export class DirectRule extends BaseRule {
     const authResult = {
       possibility: relationStrength,
       reliability: directRel.reliability !== undefined ? directRel.reliability : 1.0,
-      validity: directRel.validity !== undefined
+      validity: this._validity('identity', [relName], [this._relationValidity(directRel)], 1, relationStrength),
-        ? this._validity('identity', [relName], [this._relationValidity(directRel)], 1, relationStrength)
-        : this._defaultValidity(),
       possibility_allow: relationStrength,  // For binary mode
       possibility_deny: 0,                 // DirectRule doesn't deny
       ...(includeMeta && {

src/core/Arbiter.js

@@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ export class Arbiter {
 
   constructor(options = {}) {
     this.options = options;
+
+    // Audit affordance (caller-wired, zero cost when absent): invoked once
+    // per check with a minimal decision record. The engine does NOT store
+    // audit state — the caller owns persistence and retention. The record
+    // is built only when the hook exists, so the default path is untouched.
+    this._auditHook = typeof options.audit === 'function' ? options.audit : null;
     
     // Injectable cache factory (DI): defaults to the built-in SimpleLRUCache.
     // Pass options.cacheFactory to substitute another cache implementation.

src/core/ExplainSerializer.js

@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ export class ExplainSerializer {
       result: allowPossibility > 0,
       possibility: allowPossibility,
       ...(reliability !== undefined ? { reliability } : {}),
+      // The validity block is the full debugging detail on the explain
+      // (internal) surface — the public check result carries only the
+      // minimal label unless includeMeta is set.
+      ...(result?.validity ? { validity: result.validity } : {}),
       determinedBy: ruleMeta?.reason || result?.reason || null,
       level,
       ruleType: ruleMeta?.ruleType || ruleMeta?.type || null,

src/core/arbiter/ArbiterChecks.js

@@ -13,6 +13,20 @@ export class ArbiterChecks {
     
     // Extract epsilon/delta if present and pass through
     if (options.partialGraph && !options.partialGraphContext) {
+      // Reject oversized overlays BEFORE allocating the context: the
+      // caller-supplied partial graph is untrusted input, and the check is
+      // the allocation point for every decision (DoS surface).
+      const policy = this.arbiter.partialGraphPolicy || {};
+      const rels = Array.isArray(options.partialGraph.relations) ? options.partialGraph.relations : [];
+      const nodes = Array.isArray(options.partialGraph.nodes) ? options.partialGraph.nodes : [];
+      const maxRelations = policy.maxRelations !== undefined ? policy.maxRelations : 2000;
+      const maxNodes = policy.maxNodes !== undefined ? policy.maxNodes : 1000;
+      if (rels.length > maxRelations) {
+        throw new Error(`Partial graph exceeds max relations: ${rels.length} > ${maxRelations}`);
+      }
+      if (nodes.length > maxNodes) {
+        throw new Error(`Partial graph exceeds max nodes: ${nodes.length} > ${maxNodes}`);
+      }
       options.partialGraphContext = this.arbiter._createPartialGraphContext(options.partialGraph);
     }
 
@@ -53,6 +67,12 @@ export class ArbiterChecks {
       clientStateId,
       ...options
     };
+    // Audit needs the full validity detail (sources, conflict mass) even
+    // when the caller did not ask for includeMeta; the hook is opt-in, so
+    // this only ever costs on audit-enabled deployments.
+    if (this.arbiter._auditHook && authOptions.includeMeta === undefined) {
+      authOptions.includeMeta = true;
+    }
     // Ensure epsilon/delta are present if specified
     if (epsilon !== undefined) authOptions.epsilon = epsilon;
     if (delta !== undefined) authOptions.delta = delta;
@@ -71,6 +91,22 @@ export class ArbiterChecks {
     }
     
     if (options.explain) return result;
+
+    if (this.arbiter._auditHook) {
+      this.arbiter._auditHook({
+        timestamp: Date.now(),
+        userKey,
+        relation,
+        objectKey,
+        decision: result.possibility > 0 ? 'allow' : 'deny',
+        possibility: result.possibility,
+        binary: !!options.binary,
+        partialGraphUsed: !!options.partialGraphContext,
+        validityLabel: result.validity ? result.validity.label : null,
+        sources: (result.validity && result.validity.sources) || []
+      });
+    }
+
     return result;
   }
 

src/core/graph/CondensedGraphBinary.js

@@ -88,6 +88,20 @@ class BinaryReader {
     this.decoder = new TextDecoder();
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Bounds guard: the buffer is caller-supplied (snapshot restore input),
+   * so every read must be validated BEFORE the DataView/Uint8Array throws
+   * or over-allocates. A clean error here prevents RangeError crashes and
+   * oversized allocations from malformed buffers.
+   */
+  ensure(bytes) {
+    if (bytes < 0 || this.offset + bytes > this.view.byteLength) {
+      throw new Error(
+        `CondensedGraphBinary: read past end of buffer (offset ${this.offset}, need ${bytes}, length ${this.view.byteLength})`
+      );
+    }
+  }
+
   align(alignment) {
     if (alignment <= 1) return;
     const padding = (alignment - (this.offset % alignment)) % alignment;
@@ -95,36 +109,42 @@ class BinaryReader {
   }
 
   readUint8() {
+    this.ensure(1);
     const value = this.view.getUint8(this.offset);
     this.offset += 1;
     return value;
   }
 
   readUint16() {
+    this.ensure(2);
     const value = this.view.getUint16(this.offset, true);
     this.offset += 2;
     return value;
   }
 
   readUint32() {
+    this.ensure(4);
     const value = this.view.getUint32(this.offset, true);
     this.offset += 4;
     return value;
   }
 
   readInt32() {
+    this.ensure(4);
     const value = this.view.getInt32(this.offset, true);
     this.offset += 4;
     return value;
   }
 
   readFloat64() {
+    this.ensure(8);
     const value = this.view.getFloat64(this.offset, true);
     this.offset += 8;
     return value;
   }
 
   readBytes(length) {
+    this.ensure(length);
     const bytes = new Uint8Array(this.view.buffer, this.offset, length);
     this.offset += length;
     return bytes;

src/core/possibility.js

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+/**
+ * src/core/possibility.js — explicit possibilistic semantics.
+ *
+ * The single authoritative home for what the engine's operators MEAN in
+ * possibility theory, in the spirit of Martin's plausibility contours and
+ * Cella's FVN fusion (see zig-contour/spec/02-fusion.md).
+ *
+ * Possibility theory axioms the engine honors:
+ *   - Possibility is maxitive: plausibility of a disjunction is the MAX of
+ *     the plausibilities. This is why OR (union) is max and why max is the
+ *     only operator that is already "valid and normalized" under arbitrary
+ *     dependence (Cella §7.2).
+ *   - A possibility value is a ranking, not a probability: 0.6 means "this
+ *     is the least plausible option whose negation is not strictly more
+ *     plausible" — it does NOT mean a 60% chance.
+ *   - Conjunctive combination (AND) is the MIN, and the raw min is an
+ *     UNVALIDIFIED ranking: the arbitrary-regime validification is
+ *     min(1, K*gamma_min) (Prop 1 bound), and the pre-normalization
+ *     suppression (conflict mass = 1 - gamma) must be surfaced, never
+ *     silently dropped.
+ *   - The PRODUCT operator (P(A)*(1-P(B)) in exclusion/defeasible) has no
+ *     linear validification under arbitrary dependence (Cella Thm 4). Its
+ *     outputs are ranking heuristics, never valid possibilities.
+ *   - Interior OWA weights produce convex mixtures of plausibilities,
+ *     which are not maxitive; they are scoring heuristics (nonMaxitive).
+ *   - Reliability is NOT a possibility: it is a scalar confidence that
+ *     adapts the fusion ranking (a fusion-step combiner), and must never
+ *     be presented as, or conflated with, the plausibility value.
+ */
+
+export const OPERATOR_SEMANTICS = {
+  identity: {
+    class: 'disjunctive',
+    label: 'a single source; the value is the source\'s plausibility',
+    validity: 'preserves the source label',
+    validified: false,
+    nonMaxitive: false
+  },
+  max: {
+    class: 'disjunctive',
+    label: 'OR: plausibility of the union of options',
+    validity: 'already valid and normalized under arbitrary dependence (Cella §7.2); fused label = weakest source label',
+    validified: false,
+    nonMaxitive: false
+  },
+  min: {
+    class: 'conjunctive',
+    label: 'AND: plausibility of the conjunction of options (unvalidified ranking)',
+    validity: 'approximate at best; arbitrary-regime validification min(1, K*gamma_min) (Prop 1); conflict mass surfaced',
+    validified: true,
+    nonMaxitive: false
+  },
+  product: {
+    class: 'heuristic',
+    label: 'exclusion/defeasible: P(A)*(1-P(B)) style combination',
+    validity: 'always heuristic — the product operator has no linear validification under arbitrary dependence (Cella Thm 4)',
+    validified: false,
+    nonMaxitive: false
+  },
+  owa: {
+    class: 'heuristic',
+    label: 'ordered weighted average with interior weights: convex mixture of sorted plausibilities',
+    validity: 'always heuristic — convex mixtures are not maxitive',
+    validified: false,
+    nonMaxitive: true
+  },
+  mixed: {
+    class: 'heuristic',
+    label: 'multiple contributing rules with different operators',
+    validity: 'heuristic if any contributor is heuristic or non-maxitive',
+    validified: false,
+    nonMaxitive: false
+  }
+};
+
+export function operatorSemantics(operator) {
+  return OPERATOR_SEMANTICS[operator] || OPERATOR_SEMANTICS.mixed;
+}
+
+/**
+ * The decision semantics every consumer MUST respect:
+ *   - possibility is a plausibility ranking; thresholds are ranking
+ *     cutoffs, not probability bounds
+ *   - a heuristic-labeled result carries no validity guarantee
+ *   - reliability adapts the ranking; it does not measure plausibility
+ *   - conflictMass is a debugging diagnostic, not a decision input
+ */
+export const DECISION_SEMANTICS = Object.freeze({
+  possibilityIsRanking: true,
+  reliabilityIsAdaptation: true,
+  conflictMassIsDiagnostic: true,
+  heuristicResultsCarryNoGuarantee: true
+});

src/core/validity.js

@@ -143,6 +143,21 @@ export function buildValidity(optsOrOp, sourcesArg = [], sourceLabelsArg = [], K
 }
 
 /** Merge several rule-level validity blocks into one (weakest label, unioned sources). */
+/**
+ * Minimal public form: label + operator only. Conflict mass, the
+ * validified value, sources, and the non-maxitive flag are debugging /
+ * internal-logging detail (re-entrant tracing practice: verbose traces are
+ * opt-in, never on the default result path).
+ */
+export function minimalValidity(block) {
+  if (!block) return { label: 'heuristic', operator: 'identity', regime: 'arbitrary' };
+  return {
+    label: block.label || 'heuristic',
+    operator: block.operator || 'identity',
+    regime: block.regime || 'arbitrary'
+  };
+}
+
 export function mergeValidity(blocks) {
   const present = (blocks || []).filter(Boolean);
   if (present.length === 0) {

tests/rigor/validity-parity.test.js

@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ function mk() {
 
 describe('Possibilistic validity metadata (rigor)', () => {
   it('FIXED: labels, operators, conflict mass, validification per kind', () => {
-    // direct unlabeled -> heuristic identity
+    // direct unlabeled -> heuristic identity; default carries the minimal
+    // public block (label/operator), the full detail is includeMeta-only
     {
       const a = mk();
       a.setRelationConfig('t', { type: 'direct', relation: 'r1' });
@@ -41,8 +42,9 @@ describe('Possibilistic validity metadata (rigor)', () => {
       const r = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
       assert.equal(r.validity.label, 'heuristic');
       assert.equal(r.validity.operator, 'identity');
-      assert.deepEqual(r.validity.sources, ['r1']);
+      const r2 = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { includeMeta: true });
-      assert.equal(r.validity.conflictMass, 0);
+      assert.deepEqual(r2.validity.sources, ['r1']);
+      assert.equal(r2.validity.conflictMass, 0);
     }
     // labeled direct propagates its label
     {
@@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ describe('Possibilistic validity metadata (rigor)', () => {
       const r = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
       assert.equal(r.validity.label, 'conformal', 'weakest label wins through max');
       assert.equal(r.validity.operator, 'max');
-      assert.equal(r.validity.nonMaxitive, false);
+      assert.equal(a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { includeMeta: true }).validity.nonMaxitive, false);
     }
     // interior OWA is non-maxitive heuristic
     {
@@ -70,7 +72,7 @@ describe('Possibilistic validity metadata (rigor)', () => {
       a.addRelation('u:0', 'r2', 'd:0', { possibility: 0.5, validity: 'finite_sample' });
       const r = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
       assert.equal(r.validity.operator, 'owa');
-      assert.equal(r.validity.nonMaxitive, true);
+      assert.equal(a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { includeMeta: true }).validity.nonMaxitive, true);
       assert.equal(r.validity.label, 'heuristic', 'averaging never claims validity');
     }
     // min fusion: approximate, conflict mass, validification
@@ -82,8 +84,9 @@ describe('Possibilistic validity metadata (rigor)', () => {
       const r = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
       assert.equal(r.validity.operator, 'min');
       assert.equal(r.validity.label, 'approximate', 'unvalidified conjunctive is approximate at best');
-      assert.ok(Math.abs(r.validity.conflictMass - (1 - 0.5)) < 1e-9, 'conflict mass = 1 - possibility');
+      const rDetail = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { includeMeta: true });
-      assert.equal(r.validity.validifiedPossibility, 1, 'min(1, K*gamma) with K=2, gamma=0.5');
+      assert.ok(Math.abs(rDetail.validity.conflictMass - (1 - 0.5)) < 1e-9, 'conflict mass = 1 - possibility');
+      assert.equal(rDetail.validity.validifiedPossibility, 1, 'min(1, K*gamma) with K=2, gamma=0.5');
     }
     // product operators are heuristic even with labeled sources
     {
@@ -103,7 +106,7 @@ describe('Possibilistic validity metadata (rigor)', () => {
       a.addRelation('g:0', 'viewer', 'd:0', { possibility: 0.6 });
       const r = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
       assert.equal(r.validity.operator, 'min');
-      assert.ok(Math.abs(r.validity.conflictMass - 0.4) < 1e-9, 'chain conflict mass');
+      assert.ok(Math.abs(a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { includeMeta: true }).validity.conflictMass - 0.4) < 1e-9, 'chain conflict mass');
     }
     // reliability and validity stay distinct
     {
@@ -143,3 +146,70 @@ describe('Possibilistic validity metadata (rigor)', () => {
     assert.ok(inv && inv.passed, `validity helpers violated in ${inv?.failureCount} cases`);
   });
 });
+
+describe('Security affordances (rigor)', () => {
+  it('FIXED: default results carry only the minimal validity; detail is opt-in', () => {
+    const a = mk();
+    a.setRelationConfig('t', { intersection: [child('r1'), child('r2')] });
+    a.addRelation('u:0', 'r1', 'd:0', { possibility: 0.8, validity: 'finite_sample' });
+    a.addRelation('u:0', 'r2', 'd:0', { possibility: 0.5, validity: 'finite_sample' });
+    // default: minimal block — no conflict mass, no sources, no validified value
+    const r = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
+    assert.equal(r.validity.label, 'approximate');
+    assert.equal(r.validity.operator, 'min');
+    assert.ok(!('conflictMass' in r.validity), 'conflict mass is not on the default result');
+    assert.ok(!('validifiedPossibility' in r.validity), 'validified value is not on the default result');
+    assert.ok(!('sources' in r.validity), 'sources are not on the default result');
+    // includeMeta: full debugging detail
+    const r2 = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { includeMeta: true });
+    assert.equal(r2.validity.conflictMass, 0.5);
+    assert.equal(r2.validity.validifiedPossibility, 1);
+    assert.deepEqual(r2.validity.sources, ['r1', 'r2']);
+    // explain (internal surface) carries the full block
+    const e = a.explain('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
+    assert.equal(e.decision?.validity?.conflictMass, 0.5, 'explain carries full validity');
+  });
+
+  it('FIXED: audit hook emits one record per check; absent by default', () => {
+    const records = [];
+    const a = new Arbiter({ audit: (entry) => records.push(entry) });
+    a.addNode('u:0', 'user');
+    a.addNode('d:0', 'doc');
+    a.setRelationConfig('t', { type: 'direct', relation: 'r1' });
+    a.addRelation('u:0', 'r1', 'd:0', { possibility: 0.8, validity: 'finite_sample' });
+    const r = a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0');
+    assert.equal(records.length, 1, 'one audit record per check');
+    assert.equal(records[0].decision, 'allow');
+    assert.equal(records[0].possibility, 0.8);
+    assert.equal(records[0].validityLabel, 'finite_sample');
+    assert.deepEqual(records[0].sources, ['r1']);
+    assert.equal(records[0].partialGraphUsed, false);
+    // overlay checks flag partial usage
+    a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { partialGraph: { relations: [{ src: 'u:0', relation: 'r1', dst: 'd:0', possibility: 0.9 }] } });
+    assert.equal(records[1].partialGraphUsed, true);
+    // no hook -> no records, no crash
+    const plain = new Arbiter();
+    plain.addNode('u:0', 'user');
+    plain.addNode('d:0', 'doc');
+    plain.setRelationConfig('t', { type: 'direct', relation: 'r1' });
+    plain.addRelation('u:0', 'r1', 'd:0', { possibility: 0.8 });
+    assert.equal(plain.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0').possibility, 0.8);
+  });
+
+  it('FIXED: oversized partial graphs are rejected before allocation', () => {
+    const a = new Arbiter({ partialGraphPolicy: { maxRelations: 2, maxNodes: 3 } });
+    a.addNode('u:0', 'user');
+    a.addNode('d:0', 'doc');
+    a.setRelationConfig('t', { type: 'direct', relation: 'owner' });
+    assert.throws(
+      () => a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { partialGraph: { relations: [{}, {}, {}, {}] } }),
+      /exceeds max relations/,
+      'relation limit enforced pre-allocation'
+    );
+    assert.throws(
+      () => a.check('u:0', 't', 'd:0', { partialGraph: { nodes: [{}, {}, {}, {}] } }),
+      /exceeds max nodes/,
+      'node limit enforced pre-allocation'
+    );
+  });
+});