test: seed all 98 unseeded rigor campaigns
The rigor suite had 98 campaigns drawing a random seed per process, making the suite nondeterministic on a deterministic engine (one real ~1/15 flake already caught in tuple-to-userset-rule.test.js). Every campaign now carries a fixed, per-test-unique seed: - 16 files touched, 100 run() calls, all 100 seeded (2 were already done) - seed names follow <file>-<purpose> kebab-case, unique within each file - no other content changed (effort, invariants, assertions untouched) Verification: full rigor suite green across 11 consecutive runs, full suite 852/790/0. Determinism is now structural, not incidental.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveSubjectKey (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('subjectKey-wins', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 1000 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'challenge-rule-subject-key-wins', effort: 1000 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'subjectKey-wins');
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveSubjectKey (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('subject-mapping', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'challenge-rule-subject-mapping', effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'subject-mapping');
|
||||
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveWithinMs (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('within-units', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'challenge-rule-within-units', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'within-units');
|
||||
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveWithinMs (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('within-priority', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'challenge-rule-within-priority', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'within-priority');
|
||||
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveWithinMs (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('null-when-absent', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'challenge-rule-null-when-absent', effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'null-when-absent');
|
||||
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._buildRequirement (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('buildRequirement', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'challenge-rule-build-requirement', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'buildRequirement');
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user