test: seed all 98 unseeded rigor campaigns
The rigor suite had 98 campaigns drawing a random seed per process, making the suite nondeterministic on a deterministic engine (one real ~1/15 flake already caught in tuple-to-userset-rule.test.js). Every campaign now carries a fixed, per-test-unique seed: - 16 files touched, 100 run() calls, all 100 seeded (2 were already done) - seed names follow <file>-<purpose> kebab-case, unique within each file - no other content changed (effort, invariants, assertions untouched) Verification: full rigor suite green across 11 consecutive runs, full suite 852/790/0. Determinism is now structural, not incidental.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ describe('ComputedRule evaluation (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('possibility-passthrough', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'computed-rule-possibility-passthrough', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'possibility-passthrough');
|
||||
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ describe('ComputedRule evaluation (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('reason-default', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'computed-rule-reason-default', effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'reason-default');
|
||||
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ describe('ComputedRule evaluation (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('reason-passthrough', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'computed-rule-reason-passthrough', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'reason-passthrough');
|
||||
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ describe('ComputedRule evaluation (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('meta-contract', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'computed-rule-meta-contract', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'meta-contract');
|
||||
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ describe('ComputedRule evaluation (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('collected-values-passthrough', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'computed-rule-collected-values', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'collected-values-passthrough');
|
||||
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ describe('ComputedRule evaluation (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('possibility-fallback-zero', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'computed-rule-possibility-fallback', effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'possibility-fallback-zero');
|
||||
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ describe('ComputedRule evaluation (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('options-passthrough', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
).run({ seed: 'computed-rule-options-passthrough', effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'options-passthrough');
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user