js-rigor: reliability flows through every rule kind; multi_hop value collection fixed
Systemic reliability gap found by the probe sweep: the compiled evaluation paths never emitted the reliability the engine computes. - Compiled _evaluateDirect omitted the relation's reliability, and the chain/multi_hop rules hardcoded reliability: 1.0 — so check() results reported 1.0 for any rule whose decision came through a chain, multi_hop, union, intersection, exclusion, or defeasible combination. - The chain and multi_hop traversals now track per-path reliability (product of edge reliabilities) and report the winning path's value; the compiled and fallback logical operators (union/intersection/exclusion, direct_list fast path, early exits) report the selected child's reliability (max/min child or OWA trace index; exclusion multiplies both legs), and normal-mode defeasible combines base x requires x defeater reliabilities. - The checker's logical fast path dropped collectedValues from union/ intersection/exclusion results; it now passes them through. - MultiHopRule.valueManager was read off relationManager where the real arbiter keeps it on the arbiter — collectValues: true on a multi_hop rule with a value-carrying edge crashed the evaluation (error result, silent denial). Now resolved at the arbiter level with a relationManager fallback for stubs. Campaign pins: reliability per kind (chain/multi_hop product, union/intersection selected child, exclusion/defeasible product), and multi_hop value collection through persistent and partial contexts.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveSubjectKey (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('subjectKey-wins', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 1000 });
|
||||
).run({ effort: 1000 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'subjectKey-wins');
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveSubjectKey (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('subject-mapping', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 1500 });
|
||||
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'subject-mapping');
|
||||
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveWithinMs (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('within-units', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 });
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'within-units');
|
||||
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveWithinMs (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('within-priority', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 });
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'within-priority');
|
||||
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._resolveWithinMs (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('null-when-absent', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 500 });
|
||||
).run({ effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'null-when-absent');
|
||||
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ describe('ChallengeRule._buildRequirement (rigor)', () => {
|
||||
rigor.crucible([
|
||||
rigor.invariant('buildRequirement', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
|
||||
])
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 });
|
||||
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
|
||||
|
||||
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
|
||||
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'buildRequirement');
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user