Arbiter/core
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

js-rigor: reliability flows through every rule kind; multi_hop value collection fixed

Browse Source 
Systemic reliability gap found by the probe sweep: the compiled evaluation
paths never emitted the reliability the engine computes.

- Compiled _evaluateDirect omitted the relation's reliability, and the
  chain/multi_hop rules hardcoded reliability: 1.0 — so check() results
  reported 1.0 for any rule whose decision came through a chain, multi_hop,
  union, intersection, exclusion, or defeasible combination.
- The chain and multi_hop traversals now track per-path reliability (product
  of edge reliabilities) and report the winning path's value; the compiled
  and fallback logical operators (union/intersection/exclusion, direct_list
  fast path, early exits) report the selected child's reliability
  (max/min child or OWA trace index; exclusion multiplies both legs), and
  normal-mode defeasible combines base x requires x defeater reliabilities.
- The checker's logical fast path dropped collectedValues from union/
  intersection/exclusion results; it now passes them through.
- MultiHopRule.valueManager was read off relationManager where the real
  arbiter keeps it on the arbiter — collectValues: true on a multi_hop rule
  with a value-carrying edge crashed the evaluation (error result, silent
  denial). Now resolved at the arbiter level with a relationManager
  fallback for stubs.

Campaign pins: reliability per kind (chain/multi_hop product, union/intersection
selected child, exclusion/defeasible product), and multi_hop value collection
through persistent and partial contexts.
This commit is contained in:
John Dvorak
2026-08-01 09:52:31 -07:00
parent f0dc14fb72
commit 4fd4e20bd0
53 changed files with 361 additions and 187 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
tests/rigor/qualitative-rule-helpers.test.js
+13 -13
View File
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._getQualitativeScale (rigor)', ()
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('known-scales', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 500 });
).run({ effort: 500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'known-scales');
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._getQualitativeScale (rigor)', ()
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('fallback', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 800 });
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'fallback');
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._calculateDecayedPossibility (rigo
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('stable-identity', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'stable-identity');
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._calculateDecayedPossibility (rigo
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('zero-periods', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'zero-periods');
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._calculateDecayedPossibility (rigo
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('down-monotone', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'down-monotone');
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._calculateDecayedPossibility (rigo
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('up-monotone', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'up-monotone');
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._calculateDecayedPossibility (rigo
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('result-in-scale', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'result-in-scale');
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._createQualitativeInterval (rigor)
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('lower-le-upper', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'lower-le-upper');
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._createQualitativeInterval (rigor)
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('point-contained', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'point-contained');
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._createQualitativeInterval (rigor)
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('bounds-in-scale', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'bounds-in-scale');
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._createQualitativeInterval (rigor)
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('zero-blur', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 1500 });
).run({ effort: 1500 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'zero-blur');
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._calculatePossibilityLossSteps (ri
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('loss-is-zero', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 800 });
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'loss-is-zero');
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ describe('QualitativeRelationalComparatorRule._calculatePossibilityLossSteps (ri
rigor.crucible([
rigor.invariant('loss-symmetric', ({ error, errorMessage }) => !error && !errorMessage)
])
).run({ effort: 800 });
).run({ effort: 800 , artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' }});
if (process.env.TEST_DEBUG === '1') console.log(report.toTAP());
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'loss-symmetric');