Files
evidence-dsl/tests/rigor/dsl-generative-oracle.test.js
T
John Dvorak 351551af0f
CI / publish (push) Successful in 9s
CI / test (push) Successful in 18s
feat: chain condition steps — defeasible/logical evidence as final chain hop
A chain's FINAL (object-side) step may now reference a defeasible/logical
evidence. The compiler lowers it to a condition step
({ rule: <config>, conditionStep: true }) that the engine verifies at
(intermediate, object) instead of traversing an edge. Requires
@arbiter/core@^1.0.3 (ChainRule condition-step support).

- _expandChainSteps: a logical/defeasible/comparator evidence is expressible
  as a final condition step; non-final such steps remain a compile error
  (a condition cannot discover intermediate nodes).
- Dependency collection (generator + DSLRuntime) descends into condition-step
  rule configs, so partial-graph requirements reach through them.

Tests: ChainConditionStep (defeasible + ALWAYS steps, independent checkability,
parallel aggregation), oracle campaign chain_condition_step construct
(oracle = min(pm, pv*(1-pb))), DSLRuntime transitive required facts through a
condition step.
2026-08-03 12:08:54 -07:00

237 lines
10 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/**
* tests/rigor/dsl-generative-oracle.test.js — js-rigor campaign that GENERATES
* legal Evidence DSL programs, compiles them to @arbiter/core configs, runs
* checks, and compares every verdict against an independent ORACLE (a hand-
* computed reference implementation of the DSL semantics).
*
* The oracle is deliberately independent of the engine: it computes the
* expected possibility from the generated fact graph using the ADR-000
* semantics (direct = edge, chain = min over steps, tuple_to_userset = min of
* the two legs, fusion = min/max over operands, when-unless = base×(1defeat),
* never = 0 when ≥0.5 else base, requires = base×requirement).
*
* Anti-vacuity: the oracle is NOT a constant — each construct maps distinct
* edge possibilities, so a trivial 0-or-1 lowering would be caught.
*/
import { describe, it } from 'node:test';
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
import { rigor } from '@rigor/core';
import { Arbiter } from '@arbiter/core';
import { DSLCompiler } from '../../src/DSLCompiler.js';
const EPS = 1e-9;
const P = [0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1];
const FACTS = `
definition Employee { id: string }
definition Group { id: string }
definition Doc { id: string }
fact owns(user: Employee, doc: Doc)
fact shares(user: Employee, doc: Doc)
fact member_of(user: Employee, group: Group)
fact can_access(group: Group, doc: Doc)
fact owner(group: Group, doc: Doc)
fact granted(user: Employee, doc: Doc)
fact group_perm(group: Group, doc: Doc)
fact banned(user: Employee)
fact group_banned(group: Group)
fact mfa(user: Employee)
`;
// Each construct: how to build the DSL evidence + which edges to add + the oracle.
function buildProgram(kind, ps) {
let evidence = '';
const edges = [];
let oracle = 0;
switch (kind) {
case 'direct': {
const [pOwn] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_read(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { owns(user, doc) }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'owns', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pOwn });
oracle = pOwn;
break;
}
case 'chain': {
const [pm, pa] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_enter(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { member_of(user, *g) { can_access(g, doc) } }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'member_of', dst: 'g:1', possibility: pm });
edges.push({ src: 'g:1', relation: 'can_access', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pa });
oracle = Math.min(pm, pa);
break;
}
case 'tuple_to_userset': {
const [po, pm] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_view(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { owner(*g, doc) { member_of(user, g) } }`;
edges.push({ src: 'g:1', relation: 'owner', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: po });
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'member_of', dst: 'g:1', possibility: pm });
oracle = Math.min(pm, po);
break;
}
case 'fusion_min': {
const [p1, p2] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_fuse(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { fusion min { owns(user, doc), shares(user, doc) } }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'owns', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: p1 });
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'shares', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: p2 });
oracle = Math.min(p1, p2);
break;
}
case 'fusion_max': {
const [p1, p2] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_fuse(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { fusion max { owns(user, doc), shares(user, doc) } }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'owns', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: p1 });
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'shares', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: p2 });
oracle = Math.max(p1, p2);
break;
}
case 'when_unless': {
const [pG, pB] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_borrow(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { WHEN granted(user, doc) UNLESS banned(user) }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'granted', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pG });
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'banned', dst: 'u:1', possibility: pB });
oracle = pG * (1 - pB);
break;
}
case 'never_always': {
const [pG, pB] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_open(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { NEVER banned(user) ALWAYS granted(user, doc) }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'granted', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pG });
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'banned', dst: 'u:1', possibility: pB });
oracle = pB >= 0.5 ? 0 : pG;
break;
}
case 'requires_when': {
const [pG, pM] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_pay(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { REQUIRES mfa(user) WHEN granted(user, doc) }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'granted', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pG });
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'mfa', dst: 'u:1', possibility: pM });
oracle = pG * pM;
break;
}
case 'composition': {
// can_via composes the direct evidence can_read, which reads the owns
// edge — an evidence-in-evidence reference resolved at compile time.
const [pOwn] = ps;
evidence = `evidence can_read(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { owns(user, doc) }
evidence can_via(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { can_read(user, doc) }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'owns', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pOwn });
oracle = pOwn;
break;
}
case 'chain_step_composition': {
// group_read (a direct evidence) used as a CHAIN STEP inside can_via:
// the step is expanded at compile time to the underlying can_view edge.
const [pm, pv] = ps;
evidence = `evidence group_read(group: Group, doc: Doc) { group_perm(group, doc) }
evidence can_via(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { member_of(user, *g) { group_read(g, doc) } }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'member_of', dst: 'g:1', possibility: pm });
edges.push({ src: 'g:1', relation: 'group_perm', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pv });
oracle = Math.min(pm, pv);
break;
}
case 'chain_condition_step': {
// gated (a defeasible evidence) as the FINAL chain step → a condition
// step: the engine verifies gated at (intermediate, object). The oracle
// is the chain's min combined with the condition's base*(1-defeat).
const [pm, pv, pb] = ps;
evidence = `evidence gated(group: Group, doc: Doc) { WHEN group_perm(group, doc) UNLESS group_banned(group) }
evidence can_via(user: Employee, doc: Doc) { member_of(user, *g) { gated(g, doc) } }`;
edges.push({ src: 'u:1', relation: 'member_of', dst: 'g:1', possibility: pm });
edges.push({ src: 'g:1', relation: 'group_perm', dst: 'doc:9', possibility: pv });
edges.push({ src: 'g:1', relation: 'group_banned', dst: 'g:1', possibility: pb });
oracle = Math.min(pm, pv * (1 - pb));
break;
}
default:
throw new Error(`unknown construct: ${kind}`);
}
return {
dsl: FACTS + evidence,
edges,
oracle,
// Check the LAST evidence declaration: the composition construct declares
// two evidences (can_read + can_via), and the composed one is the target.
relation: [...evidence.matchAll(/evidence\s+(\w+)/g)].at(-1)[1]
};
}
function runCheck({ kind, ps }) {
const { dsl, edges, oracle, relation } = buildProgram(kind, ps);
const arbiter = new Arbiter();
arbiter.addNode('u:1', 'Employee');
arbiter.addNode('g:1', 'Group');
arbiter.addNode('doc:9', 'Doc');
const compiler = new DSLCompiler(arbiter);
const compiled = compiler.compile(dsl, 'oracle');
if (!compiled.success) {
throw new Error(`compile failed for ${kind}: ${compiled.errors.join('; ')}`);
}
for (const e of edges) arbiter.addRelation(e.src, e.relation, e.dst, { possibility: e.possibility });
const result = arbiter.check('u:1', relation, 'doc:9');
if (Math.abs(result.possibility - oracle) > EPS) {
throw new Error(`oracle mismatch for ${kind} (edges=${JSON.stringify(edges)}): ` +
`check=${result.possibility} (${result.reason}) vs oracle=${oracle}`);
}
return { kind, possibility: result.possibility, oracle };
}
const CONSTRUCTS = ['direct', 'chain', 'tuple_to_userset', 'fusion_min', 'fusion_max',
'when_unless', 'never_always', 'requires_when', 'composition', 'chain_step_composition',
'chain_condition_step'];
describe('DSL generative oracle parity (rigor)', () => {
it('generated legal DSL compiles and every check matches the oracle', async () => {
const report = await rigor.campaign(
[
rigor.fn('oracle-parity', runCheck, rigor.args(
rigor.gen.object({
kind: rigor.gen.oneOf(CONSTRUCTS),
// exactly two edge possibilities (direct uses only the first);
// a shorter array would leave pB undefined and produce a NaN oracle
ps: rigor.gen.tuple(rigor.gen.oneOf(P), rigor.gen.oneOf(P), rigor.gen.oneOf(P))
})
))
],
rigor.crucible([
// `actual` is the fn's return value; a thrown error (compile failure or
// oracle mismatch) yields actual === undefined, failing this invariant.
rigor.invariant('oracle-parity', ({ actual }) =>
!!actual && Math.abs(actual.possibility - actual.oracle) <= EPS)
])
).run({ seed: 'dsl-oracle-parity', effort: 600, artifacts: { dir: '', persist: 'never' } });
const inv = report.crucibleVerdict?.invariants?.find(i => i.name === 'oracle-parity');
assert.ok(inv, 'crucible invariant missing');
assert.equal(inv.passed, true, `oracle parity violated in ${inv.failureCount} cases`);
});
it('exhaustive deterministic sweep: every construct x every possibility value', () => {
// Anti-vacuity complement to the campaign: sweep the full P × P × P grid
// per construct without any RNG, so a construct the campaign skipped would
// still be caught here.
for (const kind of CONSTRUCTS) {
for (const a of P) {
for (const b of P) {
for (const c of P) {
const ps = kind === 'direct' ? [a] : [a, b, c];
const { dsl, edges, oracle, relation } = buildProgram(kind, ps);
const arbiter = new Arbiter();
arbiter.addNode('u:1', 'Employee');
arbiter.addNode('g:1', 'Group');
arbiter.addNode('doc:9', 'Doc');
const compiled = new DSLCompiler(arbiter).compile(dsl, 'sweep');
assert.ok(compiled.success, `${kind} compile failed: ${(compiled.errors || []).join('; ')}`);
for (const e of edges) arbiter.addRelation(e.src, e.relation, e.dst, { possibility: e.possibility });
const result = arbiter.check('u:1', relation, 'doc:9');
assert.ok(
Math.abs(result.possibility - oracle) <= EPS,
`${kind} ps=[${ps}] check=${result.possibility}(${result.reason}) vs oracle=${oracle}`
);
}
}
}
}
});
});